The various organs of the human body perform their special functions necessary for life and vital activity.
Communications Chemistry magazine indicates that it has become clear to scientists from China that a person can live and remain alive without some systems and organs in his body.
According to them, a person can live without:
1- The appendix, which previously played a role in absorbing cellulose, is now essentially no longer involved in the digestive process. However, they still perform beneficial functions, such as supporting intestinal bacteria and producing immunoglobulin.
2 - Bile cyst, a small sac-shaped organ that serves as a reservoir for bile, an enzyme produced by the liver that participates in the digestive process.
3 - Lungs. A person can live a normal life with one lung.
4 - stomach. The stomach can be removed due to a malignant disease, however, a person can survive if he adheres to a special diet and adheres to doctors' instructions.
5 - The kidneys are responsible for filtering the blood and producing hormones. Today, kidney transplantation is a widespread operation in medicine, which allows people with kidney failure to continue living a full life.
As it turns out, after removing it, a person can live a normal life without a stomach, one kidney, and one lung if he follows a specific diet and adheres to the restrictions and doctors’ instructions.
Researchers previously announced that a person can live a normal life without 10 organs.
An American state files a lawsuit against “Pfizer” over the “Covid-19” vaccine!
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed a lawsuit against the pharmaceutical company Pfizer on Thursday, alleging that the company distorted the effectiveness of its Covid-19 vaccine.
The lawsuit follows a six-month investigation by Paxton into alleged gain-of-function research conducted by Pfizer with COVID-19 vaccine developers Moderna and Johnson & Johnson.
Paxton said in a statement: “Pfizer engaged in false, deceptive, and misleading actions and practices by making unsupported claims regarding the company’s “Covid-19” vaccine, in violation of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act,” considering that the company made billions in illicit profits. Dollars.
Paxton specifically challenged Pfizer's claim that its vaccine was 95% effective against the new coronavirus, arguing that this was a statistical trick called "relative risk reduction," which the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) admitted may mislead consumers about... By presenting the treatment as more effective than it is.
The lawsuit said that clinical trial data showed that the dose actually reduced the probability of contracting “Covid-19” by only 0.85%.
According to the complaint, the epidemic “got worse” after the majority of Americans were vaccinated against the disease, noting that “official government reports showed that in at least some places, the percentage of those vaccinated who died from “Covid-19” was greater than those who did not. They are being vaccinated."
The lawsuit also alleges that Pfizer intentionally made false and unsupported claims about the vaccine's performance against variants, including the Delta variant, while calling its critics "criminals" and accusing them of spreading "misinformation."
Paxton is seeking financial penalties and an injunction preventing Pfizer from continuing to "misrepresent" the effectiveness of its product.
In a statement to the media, a Pfizer spokesperson said the company is “deeply committed to the well-being of the patients it serves and has no higher priority than the safety and effectiveness of its treatments and vaccines.”
She added that the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine was given to more than 1.5 billion people around the world, which helped protect them from severe symptoms.
"The company believes the state's case has no merit and will respond to the petition in court in a timely manner," Pfizer said.